Louis Isadore Kahn (1901-1974), U.S. architect, educator, and philosopher, is one of theforemost twentieth-century architects. Louis I. Kahn evolved an original theoretical and formallanguage that revitalized modern architecture. His best known works, located in the UnitedIndia, and Bangladesh, were produced in the last two decades of his life. They reveal anintegration of struc ture, a reverence for materials and light, a devotion to archetypal geometry,and a profound concern for humanistic values. He is considered one of the most importantAmerican building designers of the twentieth century.
Louis Kahn also helped to define modern architecture. Architecture is the art and science ofdesign ing and building structures such as houses, museums, and office buildings. Kahn’s architecture has been several defining qualities. Kahn’s was very interested in the look and feel of the materials he used. He used brick and concrete in new and special ways. Kahn alsopaid careful attention to the use of sunlight. He liked natural light to enter his buildings throughinteresting kinds of windows and openings. Kahn’s work can also be identified by his creative use of geometric shapes like squares, circles and triangles.
Most of Kahn life is in Philadelphia. Kahn’s first important project was the Yale Art Gallery inNew Haven, Connecticut in the early 1950’s. The outside of the building is very simple. Thesurface is made of brick of masonry and limestone. However, inside of the gallery shows Kahn’s great artistic sense. He created a triangle-shaped walkway of steps that sits inside arounded concrete shell. This building was very popular. It’s represented an important step inKahn’s professional life. Kahn mostly created public buildings such as museums and libraries. However, he also designed a few houses.
His most famous home is the Fisher house nearPhiladelphia. It is made of several box- shaped buildings. The house is made of glass, woodand stone. Many windows provide a view of the nearby trees.
Louis Kahn also helped to define modern architecture. Architecture is the art and science ofdesign ing and building structures such as houses, museums, and office buildings. Kahn’s architecture has been several defining qualities. Kahn’s was very interested in the look and feel of the materials he used. He used brick and concrete in new and special ways. Kahn alsopaid careful attention to the use of sunlight. He liked natural light to enter his buildings throughinteresting kinds of windows and openings. Kahn’s work can also be identified by his creative use of geometric shapes like squares, circles and triangles.
Most of Kahn life is in Philadelphia. Kahn’s first important project was the Yale Art Gallery inNew Haven, Connecticut in the early 1950’s. The outside of the building is very simple. Thesurface is made of brick of masonry and limestone. However, inside of the gallery shows Kahn’s great artistic sense. He created a triangle-shaped walkway of steps that sits inside arounded concrete shell. This building was very popular. It’s represented an important step inKahn’s professional life. Kahn mostly created public buildings such as museums and libraries. However, he also designed a few houses.
His most famous home is the Fisher house nearPhiladelphia. It is made of several box- shaped buildings. The house is made of glass, woodand stone. Many windows provide a view of the nearby trees.
Louis Kahn also designed buildings in other countries, including India and Bangladesh. His largest project was a series of buildings that would become the government centre of Dhaka, Bangladesh. This structure includes the parliament, meeting rooms, offices, eating places and even a religious centre. This series of buildings looks like an ancient home for kings. Huge rounded and box-like buildings have windows in the shape of circles and triangles. The structure is surrounded by water. From a distance, it appears to float on a lake. Khan spent the last twelve years of his life on this project. It was completed in 1983, nine years after his death.
All of Kahn’s buildings share a common solidity and heaviness. They are very different from the works of other famous architects of the period. These architects preferred light and airy buildings. Their weightless-looking structures were mostly made of glass and metal. Kahn used stone and concrete to make monumental buildings. Many of his structures look more ancient than modern. I will make a focus on this building.
Louis Kahn was an artist who created beautiful works. However, he was not a very good-businessman. He would change his designs many times. This would make each project take a great deal of time and cost more money. The majority of the projects he designed were never built. Furthermore, he did not like to compromise his design ideas to satisfy a buyer’s wishes.For this reason and others, Kahn did not make many buildings. His design company did not always have many jobs or much money. In fact, when Kahn died, he was in great debt. This is unusual, since he was considered one of the most important architects in the world. especially
The Architect’s Design Philosophy and How Louis Isadore Kahn had Influenced Others.
Aspects of Kahn’s design that are generally valid are often pragmatically described as a “reformulation of spatial understanding”, and also imprecisely defined as “geometrical structural ism” or one-side as a “controlled dramatically of light”. However, then poetic criteria like the archaistion of architectural bodies or integration of a design into an all-embracing order remain imponder able interpretations, not presented in any further detail. The rational approach that can be tested against existing evidence and tries to avoid a speculative statement to the largest possible extent/ The analytical rationality of this approach can be unambiguously related to the Virtuvian concept of eustasy (the graceful, the beautiful, usually today Gestaltung, artistic creation, structure, design ).
Aspects of Kahn’s design that are generally valid are often pragmatically described as a “reformulation of spatial understanding”, and also imprecisely defined as “geometrical structural ism” or one-side as a “controlled dramatically of light”. However, then poetic criteria like the archaistion of architectural bodies or integration of a design into an all-embracing order remain imponder able interpretations, not presented in any further detail. The rational approach that can be tested against existing evidence and tries to avoid a speculative statement to the largest possible extent/ The analytical rationality of this approach can be unambiguously related to the Virtuvian concept of eustasy (the graceful, the beautiful, usually today Gestaltung, artistic creation, structure, design ).
